On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index dd31933..476679c 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ > > F: include/drm/ > > F: include/uapi/drm/ > > > > +DRM MIPI DSI BUS > > +M: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > +L: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +S: Supported > > +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > > +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h > > I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get > maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve > a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff. > > Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if > that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with > Dave's ack? FWIW, I've merged DSI changes through the panel tree in the past after discussing it with Dave on IRC. It seemed like a good fit and it was most relevant for panels anyway. Given that I had expected that Dave would give it a closer look before pulling than any of the vendor trees anyway, so it would be as good as an explicit Acked-by anyway. Thierry
Attachment:
pgp74HmU0s17r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
