Hi Tomi, On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 17/09/14 17:29, Ajay kumar wrote: >> Hi Tomi, >> >> Thanks for your comments. >> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 27/08/14 17:39, Ajay Kumar wrote: >>>> Add documentation for DT properties supported by ps8622/ps8625 >>>> eDP-LVDS converter. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..0ec8172 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/bridge/ps8622.txt >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ >>>> +ps8622-bridge bindings >>>> + >>>> +Required properties: >>>> + - compatible: "parade,ps8622" or "parade,ps8625" >>>> + - reg: first i2c address of the bridge >>>> + - sleep-gpios: OF device-tree gpio specification for PD_ pin. >>>> + - reset-gpios: OF device-tree gpio specification for RST_ pin. >>>> + >>>> +Optional properties: >>>> + - lane-count: number of DP lanes to use >>>> + - use-external-pwm: backlight will be controlled by an external PWM >>> >>> What does this mean? That the backlight support from ps8625 is not used? >>> If so, maybe "disable-pwm" or something? >> "use-external-pwm" or "disable-bridge-pwm" would be better. > > Well, the properties are about the bridge. "use-external-pwm" means that > the bridge uses an external PWM, which, if I understood correctly, is > not what the property is about. > > "disable-bridge-pwm" is ok, but the "bridge" there is extra. The > properties are about the bridge, so it's implicit. Ok. I will use "disable-pwm". >>>> + >>>> +Example: >>>> + lvds-bridge@48 { >>>> + compatible = "parade,ps8622"; >>>> + reg = <0x48>; >>>> + sleep-gpios = <&gpc3 6 1 0 0>; >>>> + reset-gpios = <&gpc3 1 1 0 0>; >>>> + lane-count = <1>; >>>> + }; >>>> >>> >>> I wish all new display component bindings would use the video >>> ports/endpoints to describe the connections. It will be very difficult >>> to improve the display driver model later if we're missing such critical >>> pieces from the DT bindings. >> Why do we need a complex graph when it can be handled using a simple phandle? > > Maybe in your case you can handle it with simple phandle. Can you > guarantee that it's enough for everyone, on all platforms? Yes, as of now exynos5420-peach-pit and exynos5250-spring boards use this. In case of both, the phandle to bridge node is passed to the exynos_dp node. > The point of the ports/endpoint graph is to also support more > complicated scenarios. If you now create ps8622 bindings that do not > support those graphs, the no one else using ps8622 can use > ports/endpoint graphs either. > > Btw, is there an example how the bridge with these bindings is used in a > board's .dts file? I couldn't find any example with a quick search. So > it's unclear to me what the "simple phandle" actually is. Please refer to the following link: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts?id=samsung-dt#n129 Let me know if you still think we would need to describe it as a complex graph! Ajay _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel