On 08/09/14 13:15, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi! > > On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: [snip] >> >> To the VMware guys, >> >> Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ? >> >> Cheers, >> Emil > Hi! > > vmwgfx libdrm is pretty obsolete and AFAIK not used by anyone. > As such, it's unnecessary to release a new version of libdrm each time > the vmwgfx header is updated, and I'd like to avoid that dependency. > Better to keep the local copies in the gallium winsys and the DDX. Since > the ioctl interface is backwards compatible, it doesn't really matter if > the headers are slightly out of sync. > Afaict libdrm releases are dirt cheap, and should not cause any issues. Yet it's your code so you'll be the judge of it all. I'm just a de-duplication fanatic :) -Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
