On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:36 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:31:18PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:25:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > > > > > > So in the meantime the attached patch should work, it just silently ignore > > > > the caching attribute request on non x86 instead of pretending that things > > > > are setup as expected and then latter the radeon ou nouveau hw unsetting > > > > the snoop bit. > > > > > > > > It's not tested but i think it should work. > > > > > > I'm still getting placements with !CACHED going from bo_memcpy in > > > ttm_io_prot() though ... I'm looking at filtering the placement > > > attributes instead. > > > > > > Ben. > > > > Ok so this one should do the trick. > > Ok final version ... famous last word. Minus a couple of obvious typos that prevent if from building, it seems to do the trick for me with the AST driver, no more bad mappings. I'll still send a patch that catches the incorrect mapping attempts inside ttm_io_prot() and warns to help future debugging and avoid "random" behaviour. (I need to fix other things in the powerpc code in there anyway). Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
