On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > So in the meantime the attached patch should work, it just silently ignore > the caching attribute request on non x86 instead of pretending that things > are setup as expected and then latter the radeon ou nouveau hw unsetting > the snoop bit. > > It's not tested but i think it should work. I'm still getting placements with !CACHED going from bo_memcpy in ttm_io_prot() though ... I'm looking at filtering the placement attributes instead. Ben. > > > > Cheers, > > Jérôme > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ben. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dri-devel mailing list > > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
