On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Christian wrote some patches to validate the interfaces, but I'm not sure >>> he ever sent them out. We haven't yet done a full implementation in the >>> usermode drivers to take advantage of this yet. >> >> Well right now I've consistently rejected all patches that don't yet >> come with the full thing (libdrm, usermode drivers and tests for it >> all as not ready). And I do that at least once per week since we have >> blob userspace separate from mesa, too. So if we toss that rule >> overboard (and my understanding is that Dave's been fairly strict >> here) I'll look rather bad. As in really, really bad. >> >> I strongly prefer that userptr gets postponed until it's ready. Dave? > > > That's just my fault. Wanted to wait with the mesa patches till we have the > kernel interface accepted. > > I've just send them out, Ah, seen them now, thanks. Personally I prefer if kernel and usermode parts get reviewed in parallel. But that's mostly since we have 2 separate teams. So no objection to userptr from my side any more ;-) Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
