On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 07:32:41PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 05.08.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Deucher, Alexander > ><Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel > >>>Vetter > >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:09 PM > >>>To: Alex Deucher > >>>Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander > >>>Subject: Re: [pull] radeon drm-next-3.17 > >>> > >>>On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>>>Hi Dave, > >>>> > >>>>This is the radeon pull request for 3.17. Highlights: > >>>>- Additional Hawaii fixes > >>>>- Support for using the display scaler on non-fixed mode displays > >>>>- Support for new firmware format that makes it easier to update > >>>>- Enable dpm by default on additional asics > >>>>- GPUVM improvements > >>>>- Support for uncached and write combined gtt buffers > >>>>- Userptr support > >>>Aside: Where's the libdrm/mesa/whatever patches for this? I didn't see > >>>them fly by anywhere, so I guess I've missed them on some m-l I don't > >>>subscribe to. > >>Christian wrote some patches to validate the interfaces, but I'm not sure he ever sent them out. We haven't yet done a full implementation in the usermode drivers to take advantage of this yet. > >Well right now I've consistently rejected all patches that don't yet > >come with the full thing (libdrm, usermode drivers and tests for it > >all as not ready). And I do that at least once per week since we have > >blob userspace separate from mesa, too. So if we toss that rule > >overboard (and my understanding is that Dave's been fairly strict > >here) I'll look rather bad. As in really, really bad. > > > >I strongly prefer that userptr gets postponed until it's ready. Dave? > > That's just my fault. Wanted to wait with the mesa patches till we have the > kernel interface accepted. > > I've just send them out, > Christian. Well i am still not agreeing with the anonymous thingy. It should restrict to anonymous vma period and not require a flag for that. Cheers, Jérôme > > >-Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
