On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The scheduler needs to keep track of a lot of fences, so I think we'll > have to register callbacks, not a simple wait function. We must keep > track of all the non-i915 fences for all oustanding batches. Also, the > scheduler doesn't eliminate the hw queue, only keep it much slower so > that we can sneak in higher priority things. > > Really, scheduler or not is orthogonal. Also see my other comment about interactions between wait_fence and the i915 reset logic. We can't actually use it from within the scheduler code since that would deadlock. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
