Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 09/17] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 23.07.2014 10:42, schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In this case if the sync was to i915 the i915 lockup procedure would take care of itself. It wouldn't fix radeon, but it would at least unblock your intel card again. I haven't specifically added a special case to attempt to unblock external fences, but I've considered it. :-)
Actually the i915 reset stuff relies crucially on being able to kick
all waiters holding driver locks. Since the current fence code only
exposes an opaque wait function without exposing the underlying wait
queue we won't be able to sleep on both the fence queue and the reset
queue. So would pose a problem if we add fence_wait calls to our
driver.

And apart from that I really think that I misunderstood Maarten. But his explanation sounds like i915 would do a reset because Radeon is locked up, right?

Well if that's really the case then I would question the interface even more, cause that is really nonsense.

Christian.

-Daniel

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux