Re: [PATCH 02/83] drm/radeon: reduce number of free VMIDs and pipes in KV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 11.07.2014 18:05, schrieb Jerome Glisse:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50:02AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>>
>>> To support HSA on KV, we need to limit the number of vmids and pipes
>>> that are available for radeon's use with KV.
>>>
>>> This patch reserves VMIDs 8-15 for KFD (so radeon can only use VMIDs
>>> 0-7) and also makes radeon thinks that KV has only a single MEC with a
>>> single
>>> pipe in it
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> At least fro the VMIDs on demand allocation should be trivial to implement,
> so I would rather prefer this instead of a fixed assignment.

IIRC, the way the CP hw scheduler works you have to give it a range of
vmids and it assigns them dynamically as queues are mapped so
effectively they are potentially in use once the CP scheduler is set
up.

Alex


>
> Christian.
>
>
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c | 48
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>> index 4bfc2c0..e0c8052 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>> @@ -4662,12 +4662,11 @@ static int cik_mec_init(struct radeon_device
>>> *rdev)
>>>         /*
>>>          * KV:    2 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 64 Queues total
>>>          * CI/KB: 1 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 32 Queues total
>>> +        * Nonetheless, we assign only 1 pipe because all other pipes
>>> will
>>> +        * be handled by KFD
>>>          */
>>> -       if (rdev->family == CHIP_KAVERI)
>>> -               rdev->mec.num_mec = 2;
>>> -       else
>>> -               rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>>> -       rdev->mec.num_pipe = 4;
>>> +       rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>>> +       rdev->mec.num_pipe = 1;
>>>         rdev->mec.num_queue = rdev->mec.num_mec * rdev->mec.num_pipe * 8;
>>>         if (rdev->mec.hpd_eop_obj == NULL) {
>>> @@ -4809,28 +4808,24 @@ static int cik_cp_compute_resume(struct
>>> radeon_device *rdev)
>>>         /* init the pipes */
>>>         mutex_lock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>>> -       for (i = 0; i < (rdev->mec.num_pipe * rdev->mec.num_mec); i++) {
>>> -               int me = (i < 4) ? 1 : 2;
>>> -               int pipe = (i < 4) ? i : (i - 4);
>>>   -             eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr + (i *
>>> MEC_HPD_SIZE * 2);
>>> +       eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr;
>>>   -             cik_srbm_select(rdev, me, pipe, 0, 0);
>>> +       cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>>>   -             /* write the EOP addr */
>>> -               WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>>> -               WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI,
>>> upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >> 8);
>>> +       /* write the EOP addr */
>>> +       WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>>> +       WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >>
>>> 8);
>>>   -             /* set the VMID assigned */
>>> -               WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>>> +       /* set the VMID assigned */
>>> +       WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>>> +
>>> +       /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1) dwords */
>>> +       tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>>> +       tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>>> +       tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>>> +       WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>>>   -             /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1)
>>> dwords */
>>> -               tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>>> -               tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>>> -               tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>>> -               WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>>> -       }
>>> -       cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>>>         mutex_unlock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>>>         /* init the queues.  Just two for now. */
>>> @@ -5876,8 +5871,13 @@ int cik_ib_parse(struct radeon_device *rdev,
>>> struct radeon_ib *ib)
>>>    */
>>>   int cik_vm_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>>>   {
>>> -       /* number of VMs */
>>> -       rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 16;
>>> +       /*
>>> +        * number of VMs
>>> +        * VMID 0 is reserved for Graphics
>>> +        * radeon compute will use VMIDs 1-7
>>> +        * KFD will use VMIDs 8-15
>>> +        */
>>> +       rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 8;
>>>         /* base offset of vram pages */
>>>         if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_IGP) {
>>>                 u64 tmp = RREG32(MC_VM_FB_OFFSET);
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux