On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:22:11AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 19.05.2014, 11:02 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:10:58PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > > Some architectures (e.g. ARM) need the CPU buffers to be explicitely
> > > flushed for a memory write to take effect. Not doing so results in
> > > synchronization issues, especially after writing to BOs.
> >
> > It seems to me that the above is generally true for all architectures,
> > not just ARM.
> >
> No, on PCI coherent arches, like x86 and some PowerPCs, the GPU will
> snoop the CPU caches and therefore an explicit cache flush is not
> required.
I was criticizing the wording in the commit message. Perhaps it could be
enhanced with what you just said.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > [...]
> > > index 0886f47e5244..b9c9729c5733 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > @@ -437,8 +437,10 @@ nouveau_bo_wr16(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, unsigned index, u16 val)
> > > mem = &mem[index];
> > > if (is_iomem)
> > > iowrite16_native(val, (void __force __iomem *)mem);
> > > - else
> > > + else {
> > > *mem = val;
> > > + nv_cpu_cache_flush_area(mem, 2);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > u32
> > > @@ -461,8 +463,10 @@ nouveau_bo_wr32(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, unsigned index, u32 val)
> > > mem = &mem[index];
> > > if (is_iomem)
> > > iowrite32_native(val, (void __force __iomem *)mem);
> > > - else
> > > + else {
> > > *mem = val;
> > > + nv_cpu_cache_flush_area(mem, 4);
> > > + }
> >
> > This looks rather like a sledgehammer to me. Effectively this turns nvbo
> > into an uncached buffer. With additional overhead of constantly flushing
> > caches. Wouldn't it make more sense to locate the places where these are
> > called and flush the cache after all the writes have completed?
> >
> I don't think the explicit flushing for those things makes sense. I
> think it is a lot more effective to just map the BOs write-combined on
> PCI non-coherent arches. This way any writes will be buffered. Reads
> will be slow, but I don't think nouveau is reading back a lot from those
> buffers.
> Using the write-combining buffer doesn't need any additional
> synchronization as it will get flushed on pushbuf kickoff anyways.
Sounds good to me.
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpDU1WHVQtxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
