On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:10:58PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Some architectures (e.g. ARM) need the CPU buffers to be explicitely
> flushed for a memory write to take effect. Not doing so results in
> synchronization issues, especially after writing to BOs.
It seems to me that the above is generally true for all architectures,
not just ARM.
Also: s/explicitely/explicitly/
> This patch introduces a macro that flushes the caches on ARM and
> translates to a no-op on other architectures, and uses it when
> writing to in-memory BOs. It will also be useful for implementations of
> instmem that access shared memory directly instead of going through
> PRAMIN.
Presumably instmem can access shared memory on all architectures, so
this doesn't seem like a property of the architecture but rather of the
memory pool backing the instmem.
In that case I wonder if this shouldn't be moved into an operation that
is implemented by the backing memory pool and be a noop where the cache
doesn't need explicit flushing.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/os.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/os.h
> index d0ced94ca54c..274b4460bb03 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/os.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/os.h
> @@ -38,4 +38,21 @@
> #endif /* def __BIG_ENDIAN else */
> #endif /* !ioread32_native */
>
> +#if defined(__arm__)
> +
> +#define nv_cpu_cache_flush_area(va, size) \
> +do { \
> + phys_addr_t pa = virt_to_phys(va); \
> + __cpuc_flush_dcache_area(va, size); \
> + outer_flush_range(pa, pa + size); \
> +} while (0)
Couldn't this be a static inline function?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
[...]
> index 0886f47e5244..b9c9729c5733 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -437,8 +437,10 @@ nouveau_bo_wr16(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, unsigned index, u16 val)
> mem = &mem[index];
> if (is_iomem)
> iowrite16_native(val, (void __force __iomem *)mem);
> - else
> + else {
> *mem = val;
> + nv_cpu_cache_flush_area(mem, 2);
> + }
> }
>
> u32
> @@ -461,8 +463,10 @@ nouveau_bo_wr32(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, unsigned index, u32 val)
> mem = &mem[index];
> if (is_iomem)
> iowrite32_native(val, (void __force __iomem *)mem);
> - else
> + else {
> *mem = val;
> + nv_cpu_cache_flush_area(mem, 4);
> + }
This looks rather like a sledgehammer to me. Effectively this turns nvbo
into an uncached buffer. With additional overhead of constantly flushing
caches. Wouldn't it make more sense to locate the places where these are
called and flush the cache after all the writes have completed?
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpSiMyRxEipV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
