On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gražvydas > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Plane rotation with omapdrm is currently broken. >>>>> It seems omap_plane_mode_set() expects width and height in screen >>>>> coordinates, so pass it like that. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>>>> index 370580c..5611f15 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>>>> @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane, >>>>> >>>>> drm_framebuffer_reference(fb); >>>>> >>>>> + /* omap_plane_mode_set() takes adjusted src */ >>>>> + switch (omap_plane->win.rotation & 0xf) { >>>>> + case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90): >>>>> + case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_270): >>>>> + swap(src_w, src_h); >>>>> + break; >>>>> + } >>>>> + >>>> >>>> hmm, I think that the better thing would be to do this in >>>> omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(). In fact we do already swap >>>> src_w/src_h there. Only we don't swap the width/height parameters we >>>> pass down to omapdss. Not quite sure if something changed in omapdss >>>> with regards to rotation_type, but keeping it with the rest of the >>>> rotation related maths in _update_scanout() seems cleaner. >>> >>> But then it has to know somehow if apply was triggered from >>> omap_crtc_mode_set() or omap_plane_update(). The problem is >>> omap_crtc_mode_set() passes rotated width/height (and crtc rotation >>> works correctly), but omap_plane_update() uses unrotated width/height >>> (so plane rotation is currently broken). >> >> >> Something still seems a bit suspicious.. drm core is not swapping >> width/height for crtc (other than for validating the configuration... >> which might also be needed for planes). I guess it is getting >> already-rotated width/height from userspace. So probably we want to >> do the same for planes, so it might be a good idea to move >> crtc->invert_dimensions into plane. > > OK I guess I said it wrong.. > The display I have is 1080x1920 portrait panel. > For omap_crtc_mode_set(), hdisplay is always 1080 and vdisplay, is > 1920, regardless of rotation. That is passed over to > omap_plane_mode_set() and everything works. ahh, ok, that makes much more sense.. (sorry, it's been a long time since I looked at rotation) Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> > But in omap_plane_update(), src_w and src_h are passed instead, which > correspond to framebuffer size and not display? At least > drmModeSetPlane(), where those values originate, seems to expect > framebuffer dimensions, but passing 1920, 1080 there (with 90 deg. > rotation set) results in corruption on screen caused by bad base > address for hardware overlay without my patch. > > > Gražvydas _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel