On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Plane rotation with omapdrm is currently broken. > It seems omap_plane_mode_set() expects width and height in screen > coordinates, so pass it like that. > > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c > index 370580c..5611f15 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c > @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane, > > drm_framebuffer_reference(fb); > > + /* omap_plane_mode_set() takes adjusted src */ > + switch (omap_plane->win.rotation & 0xf) { > + case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90): > + case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_270): > + swap(src_w, src_h); > + break; > + } > + hmm, I think that the better thing would be to do this in omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(). In fact we do already swap src_w/src_h there. Only we don't swap the width/height parameters we pass down to omapdss. Not quite sure if something changed in omapdss with regards to rotation_type, but keeping it with the rest of the rotation related maths in _update_scanout() seems cleaner. BR, -R > return omap_plane_mode_set(plane, crtc, fb, > crtc_x, crtc_y, crtc_w, crtc_h, > src_x, src_y, src_w, src_h, > -- > 1.7.9.5 > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel