> -----Original Message----- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 4:29 PM > To: Inki Dae; 'Tomasz Figa'; airlied@xxxxxxxx; dri- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Marek Szyprowski'; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Grant Likely; Rob Herring > Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] exynos-drm-next > > On 04.04.2014 07:34, Inki Dae wrote: > > Hi Tomasz, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 2:00 PM > >> To: inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxx; dri- > >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] exynos-drm-next > >> > >> Hi Inki, > >> > >> On 03.04.2014 19:34, inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> Sorry for late. > >>> This pull request includes MIPI-DSI driver, two panel drivers, > >>> super device support, and relevant dt bindings. > >>> > >>> Summaries: > >>> - Add MIPI-DSI Driver, and dt bindigs > >>> - Add S6E8AA0 MIPI-DSI based panel drivers, and dt bindings > >>> - Add LD9040 parallel panel driver > >>> . this driver is placed in drivers/gpu/drm/panel, and it seems > >>> to be used for exynos drm as of now, > >>> - Add super device support, and dt bindings > >>> . this patch resolves the probe order issue to sub drivers > >>> without specific lists > >> > >> I don't think the DT bindings have been Acked by DT maintainers, > >> which is necessary to merge them. > >> > >> Also I believe more discussion is needed on this, but I didn't have > >> time to comment on this series yet. Please hold off with merging the > >> supernode series yet. > > > > I sent a email about review request to you but I didn't get any answer > > from you. > > It's been just three days ago and I just didn't find time yet to review No, the email was just ping. My original RFC patch series had been posted March 3, about 1 month ago, And for my official patch series, eight days ago. So the email I sent three days ago was just a ping that I requested for you to review the patch series. > them. I would like to be able to review all the patches straight after > them being posted, but unfortunately that's not the only thing I have to > do. > So I think there was no any comments from you for a long time. > Anyway, a common practice in open source world is to let the patches wait > on the mailing lists for two weeks for people to find some time to review > them and only then apply. There might be people that don't work full time > on this area, but still would be interested to do a review in some free > time. > > Also, neither version of this series have been posted to linux-samsung-soc > mailing list, which is also a key to have a broader review. Note that this > ML is listed in MAINTAINERS file for all kernel files with "exynos" in > name. > > ARM/S5P EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES > M: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > L: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers) > L: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers) > S: Maintained > F: arch/arm/mach-s5p*/ > F: arch/arm/mach-exynos*/ > N: exynos > > > > And I think super node concept was already accepted, and relevant > > codes, component framework, has already been merged to mainline. And > > Linux staging next has already such dt bindings. Please see imx dts > files. > > Yes, they are, but for other platforms not this particular instance. > > Any new DT bindings introduced are needed to have an ACK from one of DT > maintainers to be merged, unless you can't get any reply from any of them > for a longer time, usually 3 weeks from posting the series to be applied. So should I wait for more times? > > Of course standard pinging rules apply, so you should ping DT maintainers > first before applying such series. The email I sent to you three days ago was that. Thanks, Inki Dae > > > > > I hope this time this series would be merged to mainline so that we > > could go to next step, integrating drm_panel and drm_bridge framework > > to one integrated drm_bridge. So Can you hurry up to review it a bit? > > I'll wait for your ack. > > I don't think there is any need to hurry up with this particular series > for this release. I'd recommend sending a pull request with remaining > patches separately, as the supernode is not required to make anything work, > rather than being just a refactor. > > Best regards, > Tomasz _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
