On 02/12/2014 12:13 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:57AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new >>> subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight >>> on my part. >>> >>> One exception to this is the public header file that will eventually be >>> used within libdrm. Since all the other headers in libdrm use the MIT >>> license, do the same for Tegra. >> >> The series, >> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I guess this needs explicit acks from the following people outside >> NVIDIA who touched these files:? >> >> Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (dsi.c) >> Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> (tegra_drm.h) > > Does it? Those changes were mostly mechanical in nature, so I'm not sure > if that qualifies them for having any bearing of the license of the > file. > > But if you insist I can resend with Wei and Emil on Cc. Well, it seems simpler if you get an ack; that way it documents the fact, and avoids any issues in the future, irrespective of whether those changes convey (c) owderhsip or not. I'd imagine you don't need a whole resend; just forward the email? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
