Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/tegra: Restore licensing consistency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:46:57AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new
> > subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight
> > on my part.
> > 
> > One exception to this is the public header file that will eventually be
> > used within libdrm. Since all the other headers in libdrm use the MIT
> > license, do the same for Tegra.
> 
> The series,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I guess this needs explicit acks from the following people outside
> NVIDIA who touched these files:?
> 
> Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (dsi.c)
> Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> (tegra_drm.h)

Does it? Those changes were mostly mechanical in nature, so I'm not sure
if that qualifies them for having any bearing of the license of the
file.

But if you insist I can resend with Wei and Emil on Cc.

Thierry

Attachment: pgpl8VlU8c3TH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux