Re: [PATCH] drm/mxsfb: fix missing rollback on failure in mxsfb_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Am 13.03.25 um 21:43 schrieb Dario Binacchi:
Hi All,

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:40 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

Am 13.03.25 um 15:25 schrieb Luca Ceresoli:
When aperture_remove_all_conflicting_devices() fails, the current code
returns without going through the rollback actions at the end of the
function, thus the actions done by drm_dev_alloc() and mxsfb_load() are not
undone.

Fix by using a goto statament, as done for the previous and following error
conditions.

Fixes: c8e7b185d45b ("drm/mxsfb: Remove generic DRM drivers in probe function")
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
The offending commit is not yet merged into master, and even less in a
released kernel, so this does not need to go through stable.
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 7 ++++---
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
index c183b1112bc4e9fe4f3b048a2b6e4c98d1d47cb3..b4273e678d26dbc3dee2014266d61470da4e8010 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
@@ -365,9 +365,10 @@ static int mxsfb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        * located anywhere in RAM
        */
       ret = aperture_remove_all_conflicting_devices(mxsfb_driver.name);
-     if (ret)
-             return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
-                                  "can't kick out existing framebuffers\n");
+     if (ret) {
+             dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't kick out existing framebuffers\n");
+             goto err_unload;
+     }
I must have missed that when I reviewed the patch. But this call should
happen much earlier. right at the top of the probe function before
drm_dev_alloc().
I had added the call to aperture_remove_all_conflicting_devices()
after mxsfb_load() to
keep the splash screen loaded by U-Boot. So, IMHO, it would be better
to add the
goto in case of an error rather than moving
aperture_remove_all_conflicting_devices()
to the beginning of the probe function.

But is that really safe?  Once you start touching any of the graphics registers, the previous framebuffer and display mode potentially becomes invalid. (Depends on the details of the driver and hardware, of course.)

Best regards
Thomas


Thanks and regards,
Dario

Conflicting drivers need to be kicked out before
setting up DRM. Could you please send a patch to move the call to the
top? No extra cleanup would be required then.

Best regards
Thomas

       ret = drm_dev_register(drm, 0);
       if (ret)

---
base-commit: f9f087d946266bc5da7c3a17bd8fd9d01969e3cf
change-id: 20250313-mxsfb_probe-fix-rollback-on-error-3074b9080f34

Best regards,
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)



--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux