Am 11.03.25 um 20:01 schrieb Qasim Ijaz: > In the ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk() test function, resv is allocated > using kunit_kzalloc(), but the subsequent assertion mistakenly > verifies the ttm_dev pointer instead of checking the resv pointer. > This mistake means that if allocation for resv fails, the error will > go undetected, resv will be NULL and a call to dma_resv_init(resv) The description here is correct, but the subject line is a bit misleading. Please use something like this instead "drm/ttm/tests: incorrect assert in ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk()". > will dereference a NULL pointer. That irrelevant, an allocation failure will result in a NULL pointer deref anyway. This is just an unit test. > > Fix the assertion to properly verify the resv pointer. > > Fixes: 588c4c8d58c4 ("drm/ttm/tests: Fix a warning in ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please drop those tags. This is just an unit test, not relevant for stability and therefore shouldn't be backported. Regards, Christian. > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c > index f8f20d2f6174..e08e5a138420 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk(struct kunit *test) > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev); > > resv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*resv), GFP_KERNEL); > - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, resv); > > err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, ttm_dev, false, false); > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);