Am 11.03.25 um 20:01 schrieb Qasim Ijaz:
> In the ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk() test function, resv is allocated
> using kunit_kzalloc(), but the subsequent assertion mistakenly
> verifies the ttm_dev pointer instead of checking the resv pointer.
> This mistake means that if allocation for resv fails, the error will
> go undetected, resv will be NULL and a call to dma_resv_init(resv)
The description here is correct, but the subject line is a bit misleading.
Please use something like this instead "drm/ttm/tests: incorrect assert in ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk()".
> will dereference a NULL pointer.
That irrelevant, an allocation failure will result in a NULL pointer deref anyway. This is just an unit test.
>
> Fix the assertion to properly verify the resv pointer.
>
> Fixes: 588c4c8d58c4 ("drm/ttm/tests: Fix a warning in ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please drop those tags. This is just an unit test, not relevant for stability and therefore shouldn't be backported.
Regards,
Christian.
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c
> index f8f20d2f6174..e08e5a138420 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_test.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_unreserve_bulk(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev);
>
> resv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*resv), GFP_KERNEL);
> - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, resv);
>
> err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, ttm_dev, false, false);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
