On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:38:19PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
On 05/03/2025 at 23:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:00:15PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Add __GENMASK_t() which generalizes __GENMASK() to support different
Is it with double underscore? I do not see it.
This is my mistake. In an earlier draft, it was __GENMASK_t(),
meanwhile, I dropped the __ prefix but forget to update the patch
description.
_t is used for typedef simple types. It's unfortunate to have it
in such a macro.
Ack.
Perhaps T or TYPE will suffice. Or perhaps we want
__GENMASK_Uxx() here?
If no objection, I have a preference for GENMASK_TYPE().
ack, GENMASK_TYPE() seems better.
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
