On 3/4/25 14:43, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 04.03.25 um 11:59 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko: >> On 3/4/25 13:29, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Am 05.01.24 um 19:46 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko: >>>> Introduce common drm-shmem shrinker for DRM drivers. >>> What's the status of this patch? >> It was de-prioritized on my list a year ago as I had to move to a higher >> priority problems. Rebasing and re-testing these patches takes much >> time, it either has to be split up in a smaller parts or applied in >> one go. > > The first 11 patches seem uncontroversial to me; maybe except for patch > 9. Could they be merged any time soon? > > The next batch could then be patches up to #20, which seem to be > reviewed as well. > >> >> The current status is that I started to work on v20 rather long time ago >> and the patches need to be rebased and re-tested again. Heard that >> Panthor driver may want shmem shrinker more than others today. > > I've been receiving reports about low performance of ast plus gem-shmem > recently. I suspect that the vmap/vunmap overhead could be related and > this series would likely lessen the problem. Alright, will refresh the patches. See if the first ones sill can be merged right away and then split the remainder into batches. -- Best regards, Dmitry
