On 3/3/25 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/03/2025 09:38, Michal Wilczynski wrote: >> >> >> On 2/21/25 10:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 03:02:18PM +0100, Michal Wilczynski wrote: >>>> The LicheePi 4A board, featuring the T-HEAD TH1520 SoC, includes an Imagination >>>> Technologies BXM-4-64 GPU. Initial support for this GPU was provided through a >>>> downstream driver [1]. Recently, efforts have been made to upstream support for >>>> the Rogue family GPUs, which the BXM-4-64 is part of [2]. >>>> >>>> While the initial upstream driver focused on the AXE-1-16 GPU, newer patches >>>> have introduced support for the BXS-4-64 GPU [3]. The modern upstream >>>> drm/imagination driver is expected to support the BXM-4-64 as well [4][5]. As >>>> this support is being developed, it's crucial to upstream the necessary glue >>>> code including clock and power-domain drivers so they're ready for integration >>>> with the drm/imagination driver. >>>> >>> >>> This is v5 of big patchset which became huge. I understand you did like >>> that for v1 which was RFC. But it stopped being RFC. >>> >>> Split your patchset, keeping versioning and changelog, per subsystem. >> >> Sorry for the late reply—I didn't have access to email. I agree with >> your suggestion and will send the clock changes, firmware/power domain, >> reset, and drm/imagination updates as separate patchsets for merging. > > > How did you implement above comment? You did the split, right? Where is > versioning and where are changelogs? So I thought the sub-series should be versioned independently from v1 ? Then linked the previous discussions in the cover letter, without copying them. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
