Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2025, 18:42:32 MEZ schrieb Quentin Schulz: > Hi Heiko, > > On 2/28/25 5:57 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Commit 52d11c863ac9 ("drm/rockchip: lvds: do not print scary message when > > probing defer") already started hiding scary messages that are not relevant > > if the requested supply just returned EPROBE_DEFER, but there are more > > possible sources - like the phy. > > > > So modernize the whole logging in the probe path by replacing the > > remaining deprecated DRM_DEV_ERROR with appropriate dev_err(_probe) > > and drm_err calls. > > > > The distinction here is that all messages talking about mishaps of the > > lvds element use dev_err(_probe) while messages caused by interaction > > with the main Rockchip drm-device use drm_err. > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxx> > > @@ -604,8 +602,8 @@ static int rockchip_lvds_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > > > > ret = drm_simple_encoder_init(drm_dev, encoder, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_LVDS); > > if (ret < 0) { > > - DRM_DEV_ERROR(drm_dev->dev, > > - "failed to initialize encoder: %d\n", ret); > > + drm_err(drm_dev, > > + "failed to initialize encoder: %d\n", ret); > > All the above are using dev_err, but starting here, it's drm_err, is > that on purpose? The last paragraph of the commit message was supposed to explain that (which it seemingly did poorly :-) ) : > > The distinction here is that all messages talking about mishaps of the > > lvds element use dev_err(_probe) while messages caused by interaction > > with the main Rockchip drm-device use drm_err.