On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:41 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This needs an update given Miguel's comments on the cover letter. I > wonder if the code should also justify the choice (over cbindgen). `cbindgen` is a longer term thing and more complex, assuming we use it in the end, so I think it is fine going with this for the time being -- it is straightforward and a net improvement. Later on, if needed, we can just make `export` a no-op, right? It may also be useful to have the exports "explicitly tagged" this way. Cheers, Miguel
