Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 15:57, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 3:05 PM Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But just because TEE is one good backend implementation, doesn't mean
> > it should be the userspace ABI. Why should userspace care that TEE has
> > mediated the allocation instead of it being a predefined range within
> > DT?
>
> The TEE may very well use a predefined range that part is abstracted
> with the interface.

Of course. But you can also (and this has been shipped on real
devices) handle this without any per-allocation TEE needs by simply
allocating from a memory range which is predefined within DT.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux