于 2025年2月13日 GMT+08:00 19:34:16，Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道： >On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:49:20AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> 在 2025-02-10星期一的 11:24 +0100，Danilo Krummrich写道： >> > >> > (Additionally, in this particular case even one of the reviewers of >> > DMA MAPPING HELPERS offered to be a reviewer of the Rust abstractions >> > too, in >> > order to keep eye on the DMA API angle.) >> >> Sorry, but I did a fact check on this, and I found that the only >> "reviewer" of DMA MAPPING HELPERS is Robin Murphy, he has only one >> reply in this thread, and the reply only says "Indeed, FWIW it seems >> like the appropriate level of abstraction to me, >> judging by the other wrappers living in rust/kernel/ already", he >> didn't offer to be a reviewer, > >As Abdiel pointed out already, he did offer it in [1]. > >But that's not the relevant part, but I think how you handled being in doubt is >relevant. > >I think the correct way would have been to just ask for a pointer that proves >the statement in question. > >Instead you just went ahead with the big words "fact check" and then even got it >wrong. In your "fact check" you did not put any disclaimer to e.g. indicate that >you might not have the full picture, etc Well I'm sorry for using a too heavy word. I am not native English speaker and not ablr to understand its suitability well. >Ultimately, the way you replied to this, comes across as an immediate accuse of >lying. > >I really think that we should *not* pick up this way of arguing that nowadays >became all too present. > >- Danilo > >[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/4956d01e-2d06-4edd-813b-9da94b482069@xxxxxxx/
