On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:37:56 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ever since commit b756a3b5e7ea ("mm: device exclusive memory access")
> we can return with a device-exclusive entry from page_vma_mapped_walk().
>
> damon_folio_young_one() is not prepared for that, so teach it about these
> PFN swap PTEs. Note that device-private entries are so far not applicable
> on that path, as we expect ZONE_DEVICE pages so far only in migration code
> when it comes to the RMAP.
>
> The impact is rather small: we'd be calling pte_young() on a
> non-present PTE, which is not really defined to have semantic.
>
> Note that we could currently only run into this case with
> device-exclusive entries on THPs. We still adjust the mapcount on
> conversion to device-exclusive; this makes the rmap walk
> abort early for small folios, because we'll always have
> !folio_mapped() with a single device-exclusive entry. We'll adjust the
> mapcount logic once all page_vma_mapped_walk() users can properly
> handle device-exclusive entries.
>
> Fixes: b756a3b5e7ea ("mm: device exclusive memory access")
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
