On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:12:43PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:56:35AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> Existing DPCD access functions return an error code or the number of > >> bytes being read / write in case of partial access. However a lot of > >> drivers either (incorrectly) ignore partial access or mishandle error > >> codes. In other cases this results in a boilerplate code which compares > >> returned value with the size. > >> > >> As suggested by Jani implement new set of DPCD access helpers, which > >> ignore partial access, always return 0 or an error code. Reimplement > >> existing helpers using the new functions to ensure backwards > >> compatibility. > >> > >> This series targets only the DRM helpers code. If the approach is found > >> to be acceptable, each of the drivers should be converted on its own. > > > > Gracious ping for the series, it's been posted a week ago. > > It's a bit of a bummer the names become longer. I don't have a better > suggestion, though. > > I do like it that the error handling becomes easier and more uniform > overall, and this actually fixes many places that only checked for < 0 > with the old functions. > > I glanced through the series, I didn't spot anything obviously wrong, > but didn't do a thorough review either. I can do once we have wider > buy-in for the idea in general, so the effort won't be wasted. > > For now, > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> Is it okay to merge this? I'd prefer to have comments from other developers / maintainers, so that it doesn't become a controversial change. > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Dmitry Baryshkov (7): > >> drm/display: dp: change drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status() return > >> drm/display: dp: implement new access helpers > >> drm/display: dp: use new DCPD access helpers > >> drm/display: dp-aux-dev: use new DCPD access helpers > >> drm/display: dp-cec: use new DCPD access helpers > >> drm/display: dp-mst-topology: use new DCPD access helpers > >> drm/display: dp-tunnel: use new DCPD access helpers > >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_dev.c | 12 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_cec.c | 37 ++- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 345 +++++++++++--------------- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 132 +++++----- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_tunnel.c | 20 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 45 ++-- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c | 17 +- > >> include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h | 81 +++++- > >> include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 10 +- > >> 9 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 345 deletions(-) > >> --- > >> base-commit: 440aaf479c9aaf5ecea9a463eb826ec243d5f1cf > >> change-id: 20241231-drm-rework-dpcd-access-b0fc2e47d613 > >> > >> Best regards, > >> -- > >> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel -- With best wishes Dmitry