Re: [PATCH-resent-to-correct-ml 2/8] drm/xe/gt: Unify xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() calls.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Those calls should be from xe_gt_init, not the diverse amount of places
they are called.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
index 01a4a852b8f43..943bab94119fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
@@ -408,13 +408,11 @@ static void dump_pat_on_error(struct xe_gt *gt)
static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
{
	unsigned int fw_ref;
-	int err, i;
+	int err;

	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
-	if (!fw_ref) {
-		err = -ETIMEDOUT;
-		goto err_hw_fence_irq;
-	}
+	if (!fw_ref)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;

	if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt)) {
		err = xe_ggtt_init(gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt);
@@ -455,9 +453,6 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
err_force_wake:
	dump_pat_on_error(gt);
	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
-err_hw_fence_irq:
-	for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
-		xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(&gt->fence_irq[i]);

	return err;
}
@@ -465,7 +460,7 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
{
	unsigned int fw_ref;
-	int err, i;
+	int err;

	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)) {
@@ -543,8 +538,6 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)

err_force_wake:
	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
-	for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
-		xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(&gt->fence_irq[i]);

	return err;
}

the two parts above should be fine and is similar to what I've sent on
my probe cleanup:

https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20250131223140.4144292-7-lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx/


@@ -596,35 +589,39 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)

	err = xe_gt_pagefault_init(gt);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	xe_mocs_init_early(gt);

	err = xe_gt_sysfs_init(gt);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	err = gt_fw_domain_init(gt);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	err = xe_gt_idle_init(&gt->gtidle);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	err = xe_gt_freq_init(gt);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	xe_force_wake_init_engines(gt, gt_to_fw(gt));

	err = all_fw_domain_init(gt);
	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err;

	xe_gt_record_user_engines(gt);

	return 0;
+err:
+	for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
+		xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(&gt->fence_irq[i]);
+	return err;

this however is moving to the opposite direction from

https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20250131223140.4144292-6-lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx/

Lucas De Marchi

}

/**
--
2.47.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux