On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 02:57:52PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > On 16.01.2025 13:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > If the selector register is represented in each page, its value > > > in accordance to the debugfs is stale because it gets synchronized > > > only after the real page switch happens. Synchronize cache for > > > the page selector. > > > > > > Before (offset followed by hexdump, the first byte is selector): > > > > > > // Real registers > > > 18: 05 ff 00 00 ff 0f 00 00 f0 00 00 00 > > > ... > > > // Virtual (per port) > > > 40: 05 ff 00 00 e0 e0 00 00 00 00 00 1f > > > 50: 00 ff 00 00 e0 e0 00 00 00 00 00 1f > > > 60: 01 ff 00 00 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > 70: 02 ff 00 00 cf f3 00 00 00 00 00 0c > > > 80: 03 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff > > > 90: 04 ff 00 00 ff 0f 00 00 f0 00 00 00 > > > > > > After: > > > > > > // Real registers > > > 18: 05 ff 00 00 ff 0f 00 00 f0 00 00 00 > > > ... > > > // Virtual (per port) > > > 40: 00 ff 00 00 e0 e0 00 00 00 00 00 1f > > > 50: 01 ff 00 00 e0 e0 00 00 00 00 00 1f > > > 60: 02 ff 00 00 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > 70: 03 ff 00 00 cf f3 00 00 00 00 00 0c > > > 80: 04 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff > > > 90: 05 ff 00 00 ff 0f 00 00 f0 00 00 00 > > > > > > Fixes: 6863ca622759 ("regmap: Add support for register indirect addressing.") > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patch landed in linux-next some time ago as commit 1fd60ed1700c > > ("regmap: Synchronize cache for the page selector"). Today I've noticed > > that it causes a regression for Lontium LT9611UXC HDMI bridge driver. > > Is there any datasheet link to the HW in question? > > (FWIW, I have tested this with the CY8C9540 GPIO I²C expander on Intel Galileo > Gen 1 board.) > > > With today's linux-next I got the following messages on QCom RB5 board: > > > > # dmesg | grep lt9611uxc > > [ 13.737346] lt9611uxc 5-002b: LT9611 revision: 0x00.00.00 > > [ 13.804190] lt9611uxc 5-002b: LT9611 version: 0x00 > > [ 13.870564] lt9611uxc 5-002b: FW version 0, enforcing firmware update > > [ 13.877437] lt9611uxc 5-002b: Direct firmware load for > > lt9611uxc_fw.bin failed with error -2 > > [ 13.887517] lt9611uxc 5-002b: probe with driver lt9611uxc failed with > > error -2 > > > > after reverting the $subject patch, the driver probes fine on that board. > > > > I'm not sure if this is really a bug caused by this change or simply the > > driver already was aligned to old regmap behavior. Dmitry, could you > > check the regamp usage and review the changes introduced by this patch? > > Let me know if there is anything to check on the real hardware to help > > resolving this issue. > > Yes, see below. And thank you for your report! > > ... > > > > + /* > > > + * If selector register has been just updated, update the respective > > > + * virtual copy as well. > > > + */ > > > + if (page_chg && > > > + in_range(range->selector_reg, range->window_start, range->window_len)) > > > + _regmap_update_bits(map, sel_register, mask, val, NULL, false); > > Can you add a test printk() here to show > > page_chg > range->selector_reg, range->window_start, range->window_len > sel_register, mask, val > > ? > > And would commenting these three lines make it work again? Also try to apply this patch (while having the above lines not commented):