Hi Tomi, On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 3:34 PM Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15/01/2025 16:08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:46 PM Tomi Valkeinen > > <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 15/01/2025 14:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:42 PM Tomi Valkeinen > >>> <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On 15/01/2025 14:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 12:11 PM Tomi Valkeinen > >>>>> <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>> On 15/01/2025 12:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:04 AM Tomi Valkeinen > >>>>>>> <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Add Y10_LE32, a 10 bit greyscale format, with 3 pixels packed into > >>>>>>>> 32-bit container. > Well, this is all somewhat beside the point. So is "_Y10_32" (or > "_R10_32" if we use R) fine? IAARDD[*], but "10_32" makes me think it stores one 10-bit pixel in a 32-bit word (i.e. a 32-bit variant of R10). So [YR]PA4 would be better. [*] I am a rookie DRM developer... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds