Hi Am 14.01.25 um 17:44 schrieb Doug Anderson:
FWIW it's good that Thomas replied to your patch, since that was the only thing that showed up in my inbox. Your initial patch showed up as spam for me. :( Not sure why, though...
FTR, my R-b was for the code itself. I did not verify if the values are meaningful/correct.
Best regards Thomas
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c index 94a46241dece..a3402b76aa3e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c @@ -1909,6 +1909,7 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] = { EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0ac5, &delay_200_500_e50, "NV116WHM-N4C"), EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0ae8, &delay_200_500_e50_p2e80, "NV140WUM-N41"), EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0b34, &delay_200_500_e80, "NV122WUM-N41"), + EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0b09, &delay_200_500_e50_p2e200, "NV140FHM-NZ"), EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('B', 'O', 'E', 0x0b43, &delay_200_500_e200, "NV140FHM-T09"),This is mis-sorted. 0xb09 should be _before_ 0x0b34. I'll often fix this up when applying (though it's more work for me), but since I had a question above about delay_200_500_e50_p2e200 vs. delay_200_500_e50_p2e80 maybe you can answer and also send a v2 with the sort order fixed. -Doug
-- -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
