Hi,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 2:29 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have a few reports of sc7180-trogdor-pompom devices that have a
> panel in them that IDs as STA 0x0004 and has the following raw EDID:
>
> 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 4e 81 04 00 00 00 00 00
> 10 20 01 04 a5 1a 0e 78 0a dc dd 96 5b 5b 91 28
> 1f 52 54 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
> 01 01 01 01 01 01 8e 1c 56 a0 50 00 1e 30 28 20
> 55 00 00 90 10 00 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fe
> 00 31 31 36 4b 48 44 30 32 34 30 30 36 0a 00 e6
>
> We've been unable to locate a datasheet for this panel and our partner
> has not been responsive, but all Starry eDP datasheets that we can
> find agree on the same timing (delay_100_500_e200) so it should be
> safe to use that here instead of the super conservative timings. We'll
> still go a little extra conservative and allow `hpd_absent` of 200
> instead of 100 because that won't add any real-world delay in most
> cases.
>
> We'll associate the string from the EDID ("116KHD024006") with this
> panel. Given that the ID is the suspicious value of 0x0004 it seems
> likely that Starry doesn't always update their IDs but the string will
> still work to differentiate if we ever need to in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Pushed to drm-misc-next:
[1/1] drm/panel-edp: Add Starry 116KHD024006
commit: 749b5b279e5636cdcef51e15d67b77162cca6caa
