Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Move DSI mode check to _atomic_check()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:57:36AM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
> 
> At present, the DSI mode configuration check happens during the
> _atomic_enable() phase, which is not really the best place for this.
> Moreover, if the mode is not valid, the driver gives a warning and
> continues the hardware configuration.
> 
> Move the DSI mode configuration check to _atomic_check() instead, which
> can properly report back any invalid mode, before the _enable phase even
> begins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c    | 87 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h    |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> index 5db5dbbbcaad..b785df45bc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct cdns_dsi {
>  	bool link_initialized;
>  	bool phy_initialized;
>  	struct phy *dphy;
> +	struct cdns_dsi_cfg dsi_cfg;

Is this still something necessary / useful? I think the point was to
move dsi_cfg to the state, while this is a non-state struct.

>  };
>  
>  #endif /* !__CDNS_DSI_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux