Hello Dmitry, > The patch LGTM, but the commit message needs some work. Why/how does > TIDSS require bridges to use atomic ops? In hindsight that indeed could've been worded better, the approach here was as a stepping stone to implementing the input bus formats, which is what TIDSS needs, so I'll reword the commit as to make clear that this is done so the bus formats can be implemented to support bridges where this is required. Best regards, Jesse
