On 30/12/2024 18:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 04:15:42PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:54:27 +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
This patch series adds the listed bug fixes that have been missing
in upstream fastRPC driver:
- Page address for registered buffer(with fd) is not calculated
properly.
- Page size calculation for non-registered buffer(copy buffer) is
incorrect.
[...]
Applied, thanks!
May I ask, why they are being accepted with the obvious checkpatch
warnings?
If you are referring to this warning.
WARNING: Invalid email format for stable: 'stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>',
prefer 'stable@xxxxxxxxxx'
I tend to fix such small warnings before applying. These are fixed now.
What kind of process is being followed, as those patches had review
comments to be implemented in the next iteration.
I apply these patches if it looks good to me. This also helps with
getting it tested from wider audience via linux-next.
I do run TFLite workloads before it ends up in char-misc, but not for
every patch.
sorry If I missed any blocker comments, but your comments were more on
the cover letter content and asking about the work loads which triggers
these bugs.
Are these patches breaking any of your test-cases?
--srini
