On 12/24/2024 10:13 AM, John Harrison
wrote:
On 12/23/2024 15:20, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
On 12/20/2024 5:19 PM, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:I disagree that the first print has no useful information. It tells us that a call is being made and these are the parameters. We do not know what the failure is. It seems highly unlikely that the size changes from query to the next given that the table is a fixed entity. It is much more likely to be a caching type issue with GuC reading data the KMD did not write. If so, GuC could potentially read non-zero data for the initial size query and complain that data is invalid.
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> Add debug info to help investigate a very rare bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13385 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c index b67a15f742762..868195c33f5b3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include "gt/intel_hwconfig.h" #include "i915_drv.h" #include "i915_memcpy.h" +#include "intel_guc_print.h" /* * GuC has a blob containing hardware configuration information (HWConfig). @@ -42,6 +43,8 @@ static int __guc_action_get_hwconfig(struct intel_guc *guc, }; int ret; + guc_dbg(guc, "Querying HW config table: size = %d, offset = 0x%08X\n", + ggtt_size, ggtt_offset);
This seems to result in a double-log where the first print has no useful information, e.g.:
[drm:__guc_action_get_hwconfig [i915]] GT0: GUC: Querying HW config table: size = 0, offset = 0x00000000[drm:__guc_action_get_hwconfig [i915]] GT0: GUC: Querying HW config table: size = 752, offset = 0x00D05000
Given that only the second log is useful, IMO better to move the guc_dbg to guc_hwconfig_fill_buffer(), because the info needed for the second print is available there and it is only called once.
The intention is to report all calls with their parameters to try to narrow down exactly what calls are not working.
But we don't need both prints to know which of the 2 calls has failed, if the error comes before we get the second print then we know the failure was in the first call, otherwise it was in the second.
Daniele
John.
Daniele
ret = intel_guc_send_mmio(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), NULL, 0); if (ret == -ENXIO) return -ENOENT;
