Re: [PATCH v3 07/33] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Add binding for MT8195 HDMI-TX v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 18/12/24 09:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 04:43:19PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
+  i2c:
+    type: object
+    $ref: /schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,mt8195-hdmi-ddc.yaml
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+    description: HDMI DDC I2C controller
+
+  phys:
+    maxItems: 1
+    description: PHY providing clocking TMDS and pixel to controller
+
+  phy-names:
+    items:
+      - const: hdmi
+
+  pinctrl-0: true
+
+  pinctrl-names:
+    items:
+      - const: default

Drop both pinctrl entries.

+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  '#sound-dai-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  ports:
+    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
+
+    properties:
+      port@0:
+        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
+        description:
+          Input port, usually connected to the output port of a DPI
+
+      port@1:
+        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
+        description:
+          Output port that must be connected either to the input port of
+          a HDMI connector node containing a ddc-i2c-bus, or to the input
+          port of an attached bridge chip, such as a SlimPort transmitter.
+
+    required:
+      - port@0
+      - port@1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names

Please keep the same order of things here and in main properties
section.

+  - interrupts
+  - power-domains
+  - phys
+  - phy-names
+  - ports
+

You need allOf: with ref to dai-common.yaml.

+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8195-clk.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8195-power.h>
+
+    soc {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        hdmi-tx@1c300000 {

hdmi@

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Thanks for the great review krzk.

I was wondering if it'd be more straightforward to just send the bindings in a
different series, instead of sending another batch of 33 (actually, 34, because
I forgot one commit adding the DDC binding, ugh!) patches...

CK, any objections?

Cheers,
Angelo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux