Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] btrfs: replace kmalloc() and memcpy() with kmemdup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Yes, I see you have the prior work and I have duplicated your work.

Apology for the inconvenience.

Best regards,
Mirsad Todorovac

On 12/18/24 11:32, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> There's a fix for this already in the for-next branch:
> https://github.com/btrfs/linux/commit/1a287050962c6847fa4918d6b2a0f4cee35c6943
> 
> On 17/12/24 22:58, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>>>
>> The static analyser tool gave the following advice:
>>
>> ./fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4987:9-16: WARNING opportunity for kmemdup
>>
>>     4986                 if (!iov) {
>>   → 4987                         iov = kmalloc(sizeof(struct iovec) * args.iovcnt, GFP_NOFS);
>>     4988                         if (!iov) {
>>     4989                                 unlock_extent(io_tree, start, lockend, &cached_state);
>>     4990                                 btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
>>     4991                                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>>     4992                                 goto out_acct;
>>     4993                         }
>>     4994
>>   → 4995                         memcpy(iov, iovstack, sizeof(struct iovec) * args.iovcnt);
>>     4996                 }
>>
>> Replacing kmalloc() + memcpy() with kmemdump() doesn't change semantics.
>> Original code works without fault, so this is not a bug fix but proposed improvement.
>>
>> Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lwn.net/Articles/198928/__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!4OVzQmIUbyH-UGdUwMAL582hR4Q-7HN2fn9IpyxeA1T8qrcC8RdBVz4xuL4m35_kksUllAi6OmdbRehcFpwfHw$
>> Fixes: 34310c442e175 ("btrfs: add io_uring command for encoded reads (ENCODED_READ ioctl)")
>> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   v1:
>> 	initial version.
>>
>>   fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 4 +---
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 3af8bb0c8d75..c2f769334d3c 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -4984,15 +4984,13 @@ static int btrfs_uring_encoded_read(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue
>>   		 * undo this.
>>   		 */
>>   		if (!iov) {
>> -			iov = kmalloc(sizeof(struct iovec) * args.iovcnt, GFP_NOFS);
>> +			iov = kmemdup(iovstack, sizeof(struct iovec) * args.iovcnt, GFP_NOFS);
>>   			if (!iov) {
>>   				unlock_extent(io_tree, start, lockend, &cached_state);
>>   				btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
>>   				ret = -ENOMEM;
>>   				goto out_acct;
>>   			}
>> -
>> -			memcpy(iov, iovstack, sizeof(struct iovec) * args.iovcnt);
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		count = min_t(u64, iov_iter_count(&iter), disk_io_size);
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux