Hi,
On 17/12/2024 08:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 07:31:38AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Extend the Renesas DU display bindings to support the r8a779h0 V4M.
Note that we remove the requirement for two ports from the global part
of the bindings, as each conditional part defines the number of required
ports already. This came up with r8a779h0 as it's the first one that has
only one port.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
TBH, I really dislike tested-by on bindings, because "testing" is
essentially "building". You cannot test the binding different way. You
can review it, that it matches datasheet. You can test the DTS on the
physical hardware, but not the binding. So if this is equal to
"building" we do not act like: "I built a kernel, so add my Tested-by
tag". Maybe this was added to cover letter, so the tag
populated here as well.
Yes, Geert gave a tested-by for the series, so b4 applied it to all patches.
I'll drop the Tested-by from this and the next patches.
Tomi