Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: Use device wedged event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Em 16/12/2024 07:38, Lazar, Lijo escreveu:


On 12/16/2024 3:48 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.12.24 um 16:56 schrieb André Almeida:
Em 13/12/2024 11:36, Raag Jadav escreveu:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:15:31AM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
Hi Christian,

Em 13/12/2024 04:34, Christian König escreveu:
Am 12.12.24 um 20:09 schrieb André Almeida:
Use DRM's device wedged event to notify userspace that a reset had
happened. For now, only use `none` method meant for telemetry
capture.

Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++
    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 96316111300a..19e1a5493778 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -6057,6 +6057,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
amdgpu_device *adev,
            dev_info(adev->dev, "GPU reset end with ret = %d\n", r);
atomic_set(&adev->reset_domain->reset_res, r);
+
+    drm_dev_wedged_event(adev_to_drm(adev),
DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE);

That looks really good in general. I would just make the
DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE depend on the value of "r".


Why depend or `r`? A reset was triggered anyway, regardless of the
success
of it, shouldn't we tell userspace?

A failed reset would perhaps result in wedging, atleast that's how i915
is handling it.


Right, and I think this raises the question of what wedge recovery
method should I add for amdgpu... Christian?


In theory a rebind should be enough to get the device going again, our
BOCO does a bus reset on driver load anyway.


The behavior varies between SOCs. In certain ones, if driver reset
fails, that means it's really in a bad state and it would need system
reboot.


Is this documented somewhere? Then I could even add a DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_REBOOT so we can cover every scenario.

I had asked earlier about the utility of this one here. If this is just
to inform userspace that driver has done a reset and recovered, it would
need some additional context also. We have a mechanism in KFD which
sends the context in which a reset has to be done. Currently, that's
restricted to compute applications, but if this is in a similar line, we
would like to pass some additional info like job timeout, RAS error etc.


DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE is to inform userspace that driver has done a reset and recovered, but additional data about like which job timeout, RAS error and such belong to devcoredump I guess, where all data is gathered and collected later.

Thanks,
Lijo

Regards,
Christian.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux