On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:04:31 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Current way of programming of the UBWC-related registers has been
> inherited from vendor's drivers. The ubwc_static was supposed to contain
> raw data to be programmed to the hardware, but was later repurposed to
> define of the bits. As it can be seen by the commit 3e30296b374a
> ("drm/msm: fix the highest_bank_bit for sc7180") sometimes this data
> gets out of sync.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] drm/msm/mdss: define bitfields for the UBWC_STATIC register
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/43eb9a8a372b
[2/3] drm/msm/mdss: reuse defined bitfields for UBWC 2.0
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/2cb62d9f9cf1
[3/3] drm/msm/mdss: use boolean values for macrotile_mode
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/dc7b16a4f055
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
