Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] drm/msm: adreno: dynamically generate GMU bw table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/2024 21:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 11.12.2024 9:29 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
The Adreno GPU Management Unit (GMU) can also scale the ddr
bandwidth along the frequency and power domain level, but for
now we statically fill the bw_table with values from the
downstream driver.

Only the first entry is used, which is a disable vote, so we
currently rely on scaling via the linux interconnect paths.

Let's dynamically generate the bw_table with the vote values
previously calculated from the OPPs.

Those entries will then be used by the GMU when passing the
appropriate bandwidth level while voting for a gpu frequency.

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
index cb8844ed46b29c4569d05eb7a24f7b27e173190f..995526620d678cd05020315f771213e4a6943bec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_hfi.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  #include <linux/list.h>
#include <soc/qcom/cmd-db.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/tcs.h>
#include "a6xx_gmu.h"
  #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h"
@@ -259,6 +260,48 @@ static int a6xx_hfi_send_perf_table(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
  		NULL, 0);
  }
+static void a6xx_generate_bw_table(const struct a6xx_info *info, struct a6xx_gmu *gmu,
+				   struct a6xx_hfi_msg_bw_table *msg)
+{
+	unsigned int i, j;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < GMU_MAX_BCMS; i++) {
+		if (!info->bcms[i].name)
+			break;
+		msg->ddr_cmds_addrs[i] = cmd_db_read_addr(info->bcms[i].name);
+	}
+	msg->ddr_cmds_num = i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < gmu->nr_gpu_bws; ++i)
+		for (j = 0; j < msg->ddr_cmds_num; j++)
+			msg->ddr_cmds_data[i][j] = gmu->gpu_ib_votes[i][j];
+	msg->bw_level_num = gmu->nr_gpu_bws;
+
+	/* Compute the wait bitmask with each BCM having the commit bit */
+	msg->ddr_wait_bitmask = 0;
+	for (j = 0; j < msg->ddr_cmds_num; j++)
+		if (msg->ddr_cmds_data[0][j] & BCM_TCS_CMD_COMMIT_MASK)
+			msg->ddr_wait_bitmask |= BIT(j);
+
+	/*
+	 * These are the CX (CNOC) votes - these are used by the GMU
+	 * The 'CN0' BCM is used on all targets, and votes are basically
+	 * 'off' and 'on' states with first bit to enable the path.
+	 */
+

/* The CNoC BCM only needs a simple off/on vote pair on all platforms */

+	msg->cnoc_cmds_addrs[0] = cmd_db_read_addr("CN0");
+	msg->cnoc_cmds_num = 1;
+
+	msg->cnoc_cmds_data[0][0] = BCM_TCS_CMD(true, false, 0, 0);
+	msg->cnoc_cmds_data[1][0] = BCM_TCS_CMD(true, true, 0, BIT(0));

While it evaluates to the same, I think this is logically 1 (as in, one
unit of bus rate). The question of which bit that corresponds to is
handled by the macro.

"1" has not meaning, especially when we're supposed sending a bandwidth value, bit(0) means this bit has a special value


Also, a7xx sets values in both x and y parts here, while a6xx only does
so in the y part.

+
+	/* Compute the wait bitmask with each BCM having the commit bit */
+	msg->cnoc_wait_bitmask = 0;
+	for (j = 0; j < msg->cnoc_cmds_num; j++)
+		if (msg->cnoc_cmds_data[0][j] & BCM_TCS_CMD_COMMIT_MASK)
+			msg->cnoc_wait_bitmask |= BIT(j);

This is a very fancy way to say msg->cnoc_wait_bitmask = BIT(0)

Fancy but we know how it's calculated...


Konrad




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux