On 17/10/13 14:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> I'm not sure if there's a specific need for the port or endpoint nodes >> in cases like the above. Even if we have common properties describing >> the endpoint, I guess they could just be in the parent node. >> >> panel { >> remote = <&dc>; >> common-video-property = <asd>; >> }; >> >> The above would imply one port and one endpoint. Would that work? If we >> had a function like parse_endpoint(node), we could just point it to >> either a real endpoint node, or to the device's node. > > You reference the display controller here, not a specific display controller > output. Don't most display controllers have several outputs ? Sure. Then the display controller could have more verbose description. But the panel could still have what I wrote above, except the 'remote' property would point to a real endpoint node inside the dispc node, not to the dispc node. This would, of course, need some extra code to handle the different cases, but just from DT point of view, I think all the relevant information is there. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel