On 2024-12-02 19:31:38, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > On some MSM chipsets, the display port controller is capable of supporting > two streams. To drive the second stream, the pixel clock for the corresponding > stream needs to be enabled. In order to add the bindings for the pixel clock > for the second stream, fixup the documentation of some of the bindings to > clarify exactly which stream they correspond to, then add the new bindings. > > In addition, to help out with reviews for dp-controller bindings, add myself > as the maintainter. > > This change was made on top of [1] which fixes a warning on the sa8775p > bindings. > > [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/624068/ > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Abhinav Kumar (4): > dt-bindings: display: msm: dp-controller: document pixel clock stream > dt-bindings: display: msm: dp-controller: document clock parents better > dt-bindings: display/msm: add stream 1 pixel clock binding > dt-bindings: display: msm: dp: update maintainer entry Simple nit: any reason why the third patch uses display/msm as subject prefix while the other 3 patches separate with a colon and space? - Marijn > .../bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++--- > .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sa8775p-mdss.yaml | 9 +++-- > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b > change-id: 20241202-dp_mst_bindings-7536ffc9ae2f > > Best regards, > -- > Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
