Hi Dmitry, On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:53:44PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > Hi Liu Ying, > > Thanks for your review. > > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 11:34:23AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: > > > On 12/04/2024, tomm.merciai@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > From: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Introduce it6263_is_input_bus_fmt_valid() and refactor the > > > > it6263_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts() function to support VESA > > > > format by selecting the LVDS input format based on the LVDS data mapping > > > > and thereby support both JEIDA and VESA input formats. > > > > > > ite,it6263.yaml says IT6263 supports vesa-24 and vesa-30, while > > > this patch actually only adds vesa-24 support. So, to be more > > > specific, the patch subject and commit message should reflect > > > this rather than claim "Support VESA input format". > > > > Fully agree, thanks. > > I will fix that in v2 specifying vesa-24 like you suggest. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Can you please send this patch with your Renesas email address > > > instead of Gmail email address? > > > Otherwise, add a Signed-off-by tag with your Gmail email address. > > > > Thanks, for the point. > > What about adding Acked-by: from my renesas email address? > > Acked-by has a different meaning. I'd say that generally it's okay to > have this light mismatch, see [1] or any of the emails that B4 generates > for web-based submission. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20241121164858.457921-1-robdclark@xxxxxxxxx/ Thanks for sharing this example and for the clarification. This is similar to my case :) Then v1 procedure is correct? I can use the same formatting (From: Sob:) for sending v2? Thanks & Regards, Tommaso > > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry
