Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add GCE support for MT8196

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 21/11/24 05:25, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
This patch series adds support for the MediaTek MT8196 SoC in the CMDQ
driver and related subsystems. The changes include adding compatible
names and properties, updating driver data to accommodate hardware
changes, and modifying the CMDQ API to support non-subsys ID hardware.

Jason-JH.Lin (8):
   dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek: Add GCE header file for MT8196
   dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek: Add MT8196 support for gce-mailbox
   mailbox: mtk-cmdq: Add driver data to support for MT8196
   soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Add unsupported subsys ID programing flow
   soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Add mminfra_offset compatibility for DRAM
     address
   soc: mediatek: Add pa_base due to CMDQ API change
   drm/mediatek: Add pa_base due to CMDQ API change
   media: mediatek: mdp3: Add pa_base due to CMDQ API change

  .../mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml         |    4 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_ddp_comp.c       |    6 +-
  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c            |  107 +-
  .../platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c    |    4 +-
  .../platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-comp.h    |    4 +-
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c        |  133 +-
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c              |    1 +
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c              |    2 +-
  .../dt-bindings/mailbox/mediatek,mt8196-gce.h | 1449 +++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h      |    3 +
  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h         |   22 +-
  11 files changed, 1698 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
  create mode 100755 include/dt-bindings/mailbox/mediatek,mt8196-gce.h



Hello Jason,
I had a fast look at the changes that you're proposing with this series.

The reasons behind this are more or less understood on my side, but the
actual changes look a bit odd in the sense that passing a physical address
like this, on a first glance, not only looks like it may be dangerous, but
also looks like there's a lot of room for improvement.

Can you please point me at some driver/code (or a reference downsream kernel
for this SoC, which would be even better) so that I can take a look at how
is that being used?

Thanks,
Angelo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux