On 11/14/2024 8:57 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 12.11.2024 10:15 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> On 11/11/2024 8:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 9:31 AM Bjorn Andersson
>>> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Support for per-process page tables requires the SMMU aparture to be
>>>> setup such that the GPU can make updates with the SMMU. On some targets
>>>> this is done statically in firmware, on others it's expected to be
>>>> requested in runtime by the driver, through a SCM call.
>>>>
>>>> One place where configuration is expected to be done dynamically is the
>>>> QCS6490 rb3gen2.
>>>>
>>>> The downstream driver does this unconditioanlly on any A6xx and newer,
>>>
>>> nit, s/unconditioanlly/unconditionally/
>>>
>>>> so follow suite and make the call.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> index 076be0473eb5..75f5367e73ca 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> @@ -572,8 +572,19 @@ struct drm_gem_object *adreno_fw_create_bo(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
>>>>
>>>> int adreno_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>> {
>>
>> SCM calls into TZ can block for a very long time (seconds). It depends
>> on concurrent activities from other drivers like crypto for eg:. So we
>> should not do this in the gpu wake up path.
>>
>> Practically, gpu probe is the better place to do this.
>
> Do we only have to do this once?
>
> Do we have to redo it after CXPC?
Only once. Those registers have retention.
-Akhil.
>
> Konrad
