Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/sched: Teach scheduler about DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matt,

On Sat, 2024-11-09 at 09:29 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Follow the semantics of DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT in the DRM scheduler
> by
> storing preemptive fences in a dedicated xarray, which is waited on
> after all other fences are signaled. In addition to following these
> semantics, pipeline preemptive fences by enabling signaling on all
> preemptive fences before waiting on any of them.

the commit message lacks the *motivation*. Why is the current state a
problem, why is that feature needed etc.

> 
> Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 29 ++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c   | 48 ++++++++++++++++------
> --
>  include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h              | 15 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index 69bcf0e99d57..c6c4978aa65a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -201,11 +201,13 @@ static void
> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
>  	struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct
> drm_sched_job,
>  						 finish_cb);
>  	unsigned long index;
> +	struct xarray *dependencies = &job->dependencies;
>  
>  	dma_fence_put(f);
>  
> +again:
>  	/* Wait for all dependencies to avoid data corruptions */
> -	xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, f) {
> +	xa_for_each(dependencies, index, f) {
>  		struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence =
> to_drm_sched_fence(f);
>  
>  		if (s_fence && f == &s_fence->scheduled) {
> @@ -223,7 +225,7 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct
> dma_fence *f,
>  			dma_fence_put(&s_fence->scheduled);
>  		}
>  
> -		xa_erase(&job->dependencies, index);
> +		xa_erase(dependencies, index);
>  		if (f && !dma_fence_add_callback(f, &job->finish_cb,
>  						
> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb))
>  			return;
> @@ -231,6 +233,11 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct
> dma_fence *f,
>  		dma_fence_put(f);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dependencies != &job->preempt_dependencies) {
> +		dependencies = &job->preempt_dependencies;
> +		goto again;
> +	}
> +

I think this should have a comment. It can only trigger once, right? So
I guess that's why it doesn't make sense considering making it a loop
instead of goto upwards?

>  	INIT_WORK(&job->work, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work);
>  	schedule_work(&job->work);
>  }
> @@ -456,17 +463,33 @@ drm_sched_job_dependency(struct drm_sched_job
> *job,
>  			 struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>  {
>  	struct dma_fence *f;
> +	struct xarray *dependencies;
> +
> +again:
> +	dependencies = job->resolve_preempt_dependencies ?
> +		&job->preempt_dependencies : &job->dependencies;

I don't think it's good to use the ternary operator for such long
statements.

if-else is more readable.

>  
>  	/* We keep the fence around, so we can iterate over all
> dependencies
>  	 * in drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() to ensure all deps are
> signaled
>  	 * before killing the job.
>  	 */
> -	f = xa_load(&job->dependencies, job->last_dependency);
> +	f = xa_load(dependencies, job->last_dependency);
>  	if (f) {
>  		job->last_dependency++;
>  		return dma_fence_get(f);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Switch resolving preempt dependencies pipelining
> signaling */

I don't understand this comment. I guess you want to say that this section resolves preemption dependencies for the (fence) pipeline signaling?

> +	if (!job->resolve_preempt_dependencies) {
> +		unsigned long index;
> +
> +		xa_for_each(&job->preempt_dependencies, index, f)
> +			dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(f);
> +
> +		job->resolve_preempt_dependencies = true;

Hm, is this set to false ever again? It seems it doesn't need to? So
the goto again is only ever triggered once?

> +		goto again;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (job->sched->ops->prepare_job)
>  		return job->sched->ops->prepare_job(job, entity);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 7ce25281c74c..eceb9b8c6f5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&job->list);
>  
>  	xa_init_flags(&job->dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> +	xa_init_flags(&job->preempt_dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -864,21 +865,14 @@ void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job
> *job)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
>  
> -/**
> - * drm_sched_job_add_dependency - adds the fence as a job dependency
> - * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> - * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
> - *
> - * Note that @fence is consumed in both the success and error cases.
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> - */
> -int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> -				 struct dma_fence *fence)
> +static int __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> +					  struct dma_fence *fence,
> +					  bool is_preempt)
>  {
>  	struct dma_fence *entry;
>  	unsigned long index;
> +	struct xarray *dependencies = is_preempt ? &job-
> >preempt_dependencies :
> +		&job->dependencies;

Same – is better as an if-else below

>  	u32 id = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -889,25 +883,41 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct
> drm_sched_job *job,
>  	 * This lets the size of the array of deps scale with the
> number of
>  	 * engines involved, rather than the number of BOs.
>  	 */
> -	xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, entry) {
> +	xa_for_each(dependencies, index, entry) {
>  		if (entry->context != fence->context)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, entry)) {
>  			dma_fence_put(entry);
> -			xa_store(&job->dependencies, index, fence,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +			xa_store(dependencies, index, fence,
> GFP_KERNEL);
>  		} else {
>  			dma_fence_put(fence);
>  		}
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = xa_alloc(&job->dependencies, &id, fence, xa_limit_32b,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +	ret = xa_alloc(dependencies, &id, fence, xa_limit_32b,
> GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		dma_fence_put(fence);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_sched_job_add_dependency - adds the fence as a job dependency
> + * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> + * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
> + *
> + * Note that @fence is consumed in both the success and error cases.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> + */
> +int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> +				 struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> +	return __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence, false);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_add_dependency);
>  
>  /**
> @@ -963,7 +973,9 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(struct
> drm_sched_job *job,
>  	dma_resv_for_each_fence(&cursor, resv, usage, fence) {
>  		/* Make sure to grab an additional ref on the added
> fence */
>  		dma_fence_get(fence);
> -		ret = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence);
> +		ret = __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence,
> +						    
> cursor.fence_usage ==
> +						    
> DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dma_fence_put(fence);
>  			return ret;
> @@ -1030,6 +1042,10 @@ void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct
> drm_sched_job *job)
>  	}
>  	xa_destroy(&job->dependencies);
>  
> +	xa_for_each(&job->preempt_dependencies, index, fence) {
> +		dma_fence_put(fence);
> +	}
> +	xa_destroy(&job->preempt_dependencies);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index 95e17504e46a..de16cf6b1869 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -353,6 +353,13 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
>  
>  	u32				credits;
>  
> +	/**
> +	 * @resolve_preempt_dependencies:
> +	 *
> +	 * Job is currently resolving preempt dependencies.
> +	 */
> +	bool				resolve_preempt_dependencies
> ;

I think this should be called "resolving_preempt_dependencies". Just 2
letters more and it emphasizes that this is happening "currently".


P.

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * work is used only after finish_cb has been used and will
> not be
>  	 * accessed anymore.
> @@ -376,6 +383,14 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
>  	 */
>  	struct xarray			dependencies;
>  
> +	/**
> +	 * @preempt_dependencies:
> +	 *
> +	 * Contains the dependencies as struct dma_fence for this
> job which are
> +	 * preempt fences.
> +	 */
> +	struct xarray			preempt_dependencies;
> +
>  	/** @last_dependency: tracks @dependencies as they signal */
>  	unsigned long			last_dependency;
>  





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux