Am Freitag, 8. November 2024, 15:13:33 CET schrieb Dragan Simic:
> On 2024-11-08 15:09, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 8. November 2024, 15:05:02 CET schrieb Dragan Simic:
> >> On 2024-11-08 14:56, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >> > Am Freitag, 8. November 2024, 14:53:57 CET schrieb Dragan Simic:
> >> >> Perform a few trivial code cleanups, to make one logged message a bit
> >> >> more
> >> >> consistent with the other logged messages by capitalizing its first
> >> >> word, and
> >> >> to avoid line wrapping by using the 100-column width better.
> >> >>
> >> >> No intended functional changes are introduced by these code cleanups.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c | 12 ++++--------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> >> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> >> >> index 58a44af0e9ad..f451e70efbdd 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> >> >> @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct
> >> >> platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> if (!dsi->cdata) {
> >> >> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "no dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
> >> >> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "No dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
> >> >
> >> > this is all probe-related, why not convert to dev_err_probe?
> >> >
> >> > As the doc states [0], DRM_DEV_ERROR is deprecated in favor of dev_err.
> >> > So dev_err_probe would be the correct way to go?
> >>
> >> Thanks for your quick response! Seeing that DRM_DEV_ERROR() is now
> >> deprecated (which I originally missed, in all honesty) makes me very
> >> happy. :) I've never been a huge fan of the format of the messages
> >> that DRM_DEV_ERROR() produces.
> >>
> >> However, perhaps it would be better to keep these patches as-is, as
> >> some kind of an intermediate, limited-scope cleanup + bugfix combo,
> >> and leave the complete DRM_DEV_ERROR() --> dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
> >> conversion to separate patches. I think it would be better to avoid
> >> a partial conversion, and I'll be more than happy to put the complete
> >> conversion on my TODO list. :)
> >
> > But your patch-2 really just open-codes, what dev_err_probe is meant
> > to fix. So with going this way, you're sort of making things worse
> > first,
> > until that second step happens.
> >
> > Similarly, reflowing lines for things that get removed in a week do not
> > serve a purpose - those line-breaks have been that way for years
> > already.
>
> Hmm, it makes sense when described that way. I'll see to perform the
> complete conversion in the next few days.
just a note, as written on IRC earlier, I am sitting on a dev_err_probe
conversion for dw-dsi-rockchip.
I was waiting to see if more cleanups turned up, so didn't sent that yet.
Don't want to steal your spotlight though, so not sure if I should send
that or wait for your conversion ;-)
Heiko
